Skip to content
grademywork
Open navigation
All study notes

k-12 · california · sb-942 · lcff · sbac · elpac · cast · ai-literacy · state-specific · ai-tutoring · seo

AI Tutoring in California Schools: SB 942, LCFF, and SBAC Prep for 2026-27

California has SB 942 transparency, CDE AI literacy, and LCFF supplemental pressure all converging in 2026-27. Here is a California-specific guide to AI tutoring that fits SBAC, CAST, and ELPAC without crossing state lines.

Grademy Team9 min read

What SB 942 actually requires for EdTech vendors

SB 942 (California AI Transparency Act, Sept 2024) is one of the first state laws specifically regulating generative AI in education. Here's what it actually requires — without the lawyer-speak.

What vendors must do

1. Disclose AI use at the point of interaction. If a vendor's tool uses generative AI to interact with students, the tool must clearly tell the student "you are interacting with an AI" before or at the start of the interaction. Banner, splash screen, or first-message disclosure.

2. Disclose AI use in privacy policy. The vendor's privacy policy must explicitly state what data is collected, how it's used, whether it trains foundation models, and how to opt out.

3. Provide opt-out or human alternative. Students, parents, or educators can request a human alternative for any AI-driven service. The vendor must provide it within a reasonable time, OR document why the human alternative isn't feasible.

4. Annual reporting to AG. Vendors with >1M monthly users must file annual reports with the California Attorney General on AI safety practices and incidents.

What this means for EdTech in California

  • A chatbot tutor that "talks" to students must say "I'm an AI tutor" before the first message. (This is actually good pedagogy — students should know who they're learning from.)
  • Adaptive AI tutors that use generative AI for hints, explanations, or feedback must disclose this. (If they don't, they're non-compliant.)
  • AI grading tools that grade student work using generative AI must disclose this at the grading decision point.
  • Vendors that use student data to train foundation models must disclose this AND offer opt-out.

Penalties for non-compliance

$5,000 per violation per day. For a vendor with 100,000 CA students, that's up to $500M/day if systematically non-compliant. Most large vendors are taking this seriously.

What this means for you

Ask every AI tutoring vendor: "Are you SB 942 compliant? Can you show me the disclosure you show to CA students?" If they hesitate, they haven't done the California work.

How CDE AI Literacy Initiative applies to your classroom

The CDE (California Department of Education) launched an AI Literacy Initiative in early 2026 with $50M in state funding through 2027-28. Here's what's actually rolling out:

What teachers get

  • Free AI literacy curriculum aligned to the CDE AI Literacy Framework, released in two cohorts (K-8 in spring 2026, 9-12 in fall 2026)
  • 6 hours of professional development credit toward your salary advancement for completing CDE-approved AI literacy training
  • Optional micro-credentials in AI-integrated instruction (count toward credential renewal in some districts)
  • Peer learning community through the county offices of education

What's expected of districts

  • Districts are not required to adopt the curriculum, but most will because it's free and counts toward Title IV-A funding eligibility
  • Districts must update their Technology Plans to address AI tools by 2027-28
  • Districts are encouraged to participate in the CDE AI Vendor Registry (voluntary, but adoption-favorable)

What's expected of students

Students should:

  • Understand what AI is and isn't
  • Recognize when they're interacting with AI vs a human
  • Know how AI works at a basic level (input, model, output)
  • Use AI ethically and effectively
  • Be critical consumers of AI-generated content

The CDE framework explicitly does NOT require students to use AI tools. It only requires that they understand AI. Some districts may go further and integrate AI tool use, but that's a district decision, not state mandate.

How LCFF funds can pay for AI tutoring

LCFF (Local Control Funding Formula) is California's funding system. Districts receive base funding plus supplemental and concentration grants based on the percentage of unduplicated pupils (ELL, FRPL, foster). High-need districts can have 30-50%+ of their funding as supplemental/concentration.

Permitted uses of LCFF supplemental/concentration funds

LCFF funds must be used to increase or improve services for unduplicated pupils. Permitted uses include:

  • Supplemental instructional materials (including digital tools)
  • Extended learning time (after-school, summer school, intersession)
  • Professional development for teachers serving unduplicated pupils
  • Parent engagement and education
  • Social-emotional and mental health services
  • Targeted intervention programs for ELL, FRPL, foster youth

AI tutoring as an LCFF-permitted expense

AI tutoring clearly falls under "supplemental instructional materials" and "targeted intervention programs." Specifically:

  • ELL students: adaptive AI tutoring that adjusts language complexity while maintaining content is a force multiplier
  • FRPL students: AI tutoring that provides 1:1-style attention without 1:1 costs makes supplemental academic support financially viable
  • Foster youth: stable, predictable AI tutoring (vs rotating substitute teachers) provides continuity of instruction
  • All three: AI tutoring's data reporting gives districts the per-pupil progress tracking that LCFF requires

How to structure an LCFF-justifiable AI tutoring purchase

If you're a CA district considering AI tutoring:

  1. Identify your unduplicated pupil percentage (it's on your LCAP)
  2. Map AI tutoring use cases to unduplicated pupil outcomes — not general use, but specifically how ELL/FRPL/foster kids benefit
  3. Cost per unduplicated pupil — make sure the cost math pencils for the supplemental allocation
  4. Document impact — most districts need 2-3 years of LCFF investment data to show "increase or improve services"
  5. Set measurable goals — e.g., "ELL students using AI tutoring for 30 min/day will improve ELPAC scale scores by 10 points over baseline"

If you can answer those 5 questions for your board, AI tutoring fits cleanly into LCFF.

How AI tutoring fits SBAC, CAST, and ELPAC prep

California has three major K-12 assessments. AI tutoring should support each differently.

SBAC (Smarter Balanced, grades 3-8 and 11)

SBAC is the main ELA + math assessment. It uses:

  • Computer-adaptive testing (the harder you do, the harder it gets)
  • Claims-based scoring (multiple sub-skill areas per subject)
  • Performance tasks (multi-step problem solving with writing)

AI tutoring fits well for SBAC prep because:

  • Adaptive AI maps to adaptive testing
  • Sub-skill data maps to claims-based scoring
  • AI can practice performance-task reasoning steps with immediate feedback

What AI tutoring should NOT do:

  • Replace released SBAC practice tests (use the official ones)
  • Grade SBAC practice essays (humans must do this)
  • Make SBAC-readiness decisions for students

CAST (California Science Test, grades 5 and 8 and once in high school)

CAST is the NGSS-aligned science test. It uses:

  • Performance tasks
  • Claims-based scoring (3D: science practices, crosscutting concepts, disciplinary core ideas)

AI tutoring fits CAST for:

  • Practicing NGSS science practices (asking questions, planning investigations, analyzing data)
  • Concept-checking for crosscutting concepts (patterns, cause-and-effect, etc.)

AI tutoring is NOT sufficient for CAST prep — students need actual lab/field experience. Use AI tutoring as the conceptual scaffold around hands-on science.

ELPAC (English Language Proficiency Assessments for California)

ELPAC measures ELL students' English language development. It has two parts:

  • Initial ELPAC (identification)
  • Summative ELPAC (annual assessment)

AI tutoring fits ELPAC for:

  • Speaking and listening practice with instant feedback
  • Vocabulary and grammar sub-skills
  • Reading comprehension at adjusted language levels

This is where AI tutoring is genuinely a force multiplier for ELL students. A 4th grader classified as ELPAC Level 2 (intermediate) can get adaptive practice at Level 2-3 content without pulling the teacher away from Level 1 students.

A 5-step plan for California teachers using AI tutoring

If you're a California teacher and your district has approved an AI tutoring tool, here's how to use it inside the SB 942 + CDE + LCFF framework:

Step 1. Verify SB 942 compliance

Ask your principal or EdTech director: "Is the AI tutor we use SB 942 compliant? Can I see the disclosure the tool shows to students?" If the answer is no or "we're working on it," don't use the tool yet.

Step 2. Align your AI use to a specific LCFF outcome

Don't say "we use AI for math." Say "we use AI tutoring to support ELL students in meeting their ELPAC scale score growth target for 2026-27." Specificity is defensibility — and it's also what LCFF requires.

Step 3. Document AI use in your lesson plans

Include AI tutoring in your weekly lesson plans like any other resource: which subject, which students, what data you're collecting, how you're adjusting instruction. This protects you, your district, and your students.

Step 4. Notify parents in the language they need

SB 942 requires AI disclosure to parents. Your district must have a process for multilingual parent notification. If yours doesn't, push for one.

Step 5. Use AI data for LCAP impact reporting

Districts need impact data for the LCAP (Local Control and Accountability Plan). If your AI tutoring is LCFF-funded, the per-student data feeds directly into next year's LCAP.

What to evaluate in an AI tutor for California classrooms

When you demo AI tutoring tools, ask these California-specific questions:

  1. "Are you SB 942 compliant?" If they hesitate, walk away.
  2. "Is there a signed DPA on file with California districts? Can you name them?" If they can't, be cautious.
  3. "What does your ELPAC-aligned content look like?" A good CA vendor will demo ELL scaffolding.
  4. "How do you handle SBAC computer-adaptive format?" A good vendor will demo with SBAC item types.
  5. "Can teachers see sub-skill data per CCSS claim, not just an overall score?" If they can't, walk away.
  6. "Is your tool FERPA + COPPA + California SOPPA + CalOPPA compliant?" If they don't know what CalOPPA is, they haven't done the California work.
  7. "Can a student bypass the tutoring and get the answer?" A good vendor will demo the failure mode.

A vendor who can answer all 7 in writing has done the California work. A vendor who can't is selling you a generic K-12 tool with a CA sticker.

What Grademy does for California schools

We built Grademy for K-12 classrooms with California in mind:

  • SB 942 compliant with built-in AI disclosure
  • ELPAC-aligned content with adaptive language complexity
  • SBAC-format practice built from released items and performance task structures
  • CCSS-claim-based sub-skill data in the teacher dashboard
  • FERPA + COPPA + CalOPPA + SOPPA compliant with signed DPAs
  • California-specific parent notification templates in 10 languages
  • 30-day California pilot — no credit card, no commitment

If you're a California teacher, coach, or district EdTech director, start a free trial and bring your hardest 5 students to the demo. We'll show you what the AI does with a kid who actually needs to grow on ELPAC or pass SBAC.

If you're a California district leader with 500+ students and want a CA-specific LCFF integration case study, email california@grademy.work. A real Californian on our K-12 partnerships team will reply within 24 hours with case studies from CA districts using Grademy for ELL + LCFF + SBAC prep.

Related reading

Related reading

Related reading

Related reading

Keep reading

Turn the idea into a real attempt

Join the waitlist and we will email when new learner accounts reopen.